Re: Question about Poll: Proposal relating to keepalive, TCP, and UDP usage in draft-ietf-sip-outbound

At 07:13 05/01/2007, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>Cullen Jennings writes:
>
> > I don't. The problem is not that UAs don't support TCP. 
>
>how can you from cisco say that the problem is not that UAs don't
>support TCP, when UAs from cisco and its affiliates don't support TCP?
>
> > The problems is that proxies don't support TCP on a large scale. 
>
>which popular proxies don't support TCP in large scale?  give me some
>names.  if there are some, i'm sure their vendors must fix them, because
>otherwise they would be out of business.

Well, based on sipit observations it appears much easier to compile a short
list of those that do TCP in large scale. Solely based on what I'm aware
of sole presence of TCP is okay, 50k TCP connections is very good, 200k
is fantastic (and to some extent uncertain) and more than that is sci-fi.

-jiri

--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/ 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors <at> cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping <at> ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip