RE: RE: Securing Other URI (Tel URI) scheme

>So sips is useless, at least in IMS

If you base your comment on B2BUAs, I'm pretty sure you'll also find
them elsewhere than in IMS...

Regards,

Christer

> 
> Von: Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh <at> tutpro.com]
> Gesendet: Mo 02.04.2007 17:14
> An: Stastny Richard
> Cc: Paul Kyzivat; IETF SIP List; Francois Audet; Christer 
> Holmberg ((JO/LMF))
> Betreff: Re: [Sip] RE: Securing Other URI (Tel URI) scheme
> 
> 
> 
> Stastny Richard writes:
> 
>  > Does this also mean that sips only needs to work from UA 
> to the next  > B2BUA?
> 
> sure.  i don't remember that rfc3161 nor any other rfc has 
> standardized anything about B2BUAs.  as far as ietf sip specs 
> are concerned, a b2bua is a sip ua like any other sip ua.
> 
> -- juha
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors <at> cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping <at> ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip