RE: Expert review of draft-ejzak-sipping-p-em-auth-00.t xt

I believe your anger is directed at the wrong person - I did not submit this
to SIPPING WG.  The draft came from Richard Ejzak, and through Tispan.  It
is for a "P-" header, and is for private network use and not for IETF SIP
standardization. 

I was hoping Tispan members would be willing to inject themselves in this
discussion, but since it is a European standards body and today is a major
European holiday many of them may not be checking email.

-hadriel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh <at> tutpro.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 3:12 PM
> To: Hadriel Kaplan
> Cc: 'Dean Willis'; 'Sipping'
> Subject: RE: [Sipping] Expert review of draft-ejzak-sipping-p-em-auth-00.t
> xt
> 
> Hadriel Kaplan writes:
> 
>  > Actually it is media to/from the pstn I was talking about.
> 
> they you charge whatever you want at the pstn switch, which is out of
> scope of sip.
> 
> -- juha

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors <at> cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip <at> ietf.org for new developments of core SIP