11 Mar 2003 02:07
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-smime-aes-00.txt
Enzo Michelangeli <em <at> who.net>
2003-03-11 01:07:38 GMT
2003-03-11 01:07:38 GMT
----- Original Message ----- From: "Russ Housley" <housley <at> vigilsec.com> To: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson <at> neustar.biz> Cc: <ietf-smime <at> imc.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 7:28 AM Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-smime-aes-00.txt > Jon: > > CMS no longer includes any mandatory to implement algorithms. This was > done so that each application could assign the best algorithms for their > environment. > > For S/MIME version 3.1, the mandatory to implement encryption algorithm is > Triple-DES. I do not expect this to change. However, there has been > discussion about making AES a SHOULD implement algorithm. The "Use of AES > with CMS" specification is finally nearly finished. This is intended to > send a message to implementors that AES will probably become a MUST > implement algorithm in the future. At that time, AES would become MUST and > Triple-DES would become SHOULD (to preserve interoperability with old > algorithms). Is backwards interoperability considered a SHOULD? I would think that it's important enough to make it a MUST (at least for decryption of old messages). Enzo
RSS Feed