Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5246 (3191)

On 04/17/2012 07:17 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:

> On the other hand, IKEv2 obsoleted IKE.
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4306
> So I don't this is as clear cut as you suggest.

In that case didn't IKEv2 actually made IKE obsolete?
It is pretty different than the TLS case where
TLS 1.0 is in widespread use several years after it
has been marked as obsolete.

regards,
Nikos