8 Nov 2007 23:44
Re: Re: HEAD requests to tools.ietf.org/id/draft-...
Henrik Levkowetz <henrik <at> levkowetz.com>
2007-11-08 22:44:45 GMT
2007-11-08 22:44:45 GMT
Hi Frank, On 2007-11-08 18:04 Frank Ellermann said the following: > Julian Reschke wrote: > >> You may want to look at... >> <http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-hutzler-spamops/state.xml>. > > Interesting, but admittedly I'm still in the "can create XML" > state, "can parse XML" is significantly tougher if done from > scratch...> > Oops, whatever creates state.xml, it has the same "abstract" > oddity as the I-D submission tool (see parallel thread). Yes; the data there comes from the abstract in the secretariat database, ultimately. > The .../draft/draft-hutzler.../state file is promising, same > info as in state.xml organized in lines instead of elements, > I could simply take the line starting with "Doc-url:". Sounds like a good plan. The XML file is actually created from the '822' file, which is created from the history file, which is created from 10+ different sources which are collected and diffed every hour. > Thanks, I didn't know this feature, is <ietfdoc> in need of a > "can create DTD" (in 2008) ? Umm... here you lost me ,
Henrik
>
> Oops, whatever creates state.xml, it has the same "abstract"
> oddity as the I-D submission tool (see parallel thread).
Yes; the data there comes from the abstract in the secretariat
database, ultimately.
> The .../draft/draft-hutzler.../state file is promising, same
> info as in state.xml organized in lines instead of elements,
> I could simply take the line starting with "Doc-url:".
Sounds like a good plan. The XML file is actually created from the
'822' file, which is created from the history file, which is created
from 10+ different sources which are collected and diffed every
hour.
> Thanks, I didn't know this feature, is <ietfdoc> in need of a
> "can create DTD" (in 2008) ?
Umm... here you lost me ,
RSS Feed