Home
Reading
Searching
Subscribe
Sponsors
Statistics
Posting
Contact
Spam
Lists
Links
About
Hosting
Filtering
Features Download
Marketing
Archives
FAQ
Blog
 
Gmane
From: Chris Benson <cbenson <at> adax.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP
Newsgroups: gmane.ietf.tsvwg
Date: Monday 7th February 2011 21:24:52 UTC (over 5 years ago)
Hi folks,

Sam Hartman wrote (and others suggest):
>>
>>  I think that being able to discuss concerns with reviewers and being
>>  able to consider potential conflicts and other issues mean that an open
>>  dialogue with identified reviewers is an important part of our
>>  process. Anonymous contributions may have their place in the WG
process,
>>  but I don't think they should have a place in expert review oor
blocking
>>  objections to documents.  So, as an individual I strongly support
making
>>  expert reviewers identities public.
>>  

I don't see that "public identity" (of expert reviewers) is 
required for "interactive discussion".  Or would anonymous
interaction fail a Turing test of some kind?

Chris Benson.
 
CD: 3ms