27 Apr 2010 19:05
A first cut at the Draft Charter for the proposed URNbis WG
Alfred Hönes <ah <at> TR-Sys.de>
2010-04-27 17:05:07 GMT
2010-04-27 17:05:07 GMT
Folks, Based on work done by Juha Hakala in February, I have updated and amended the Draft Charter and hereby bring it to the urn list for discussion. Comments welcome! Kind regards, Alfred Hönes. ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Uniform Resource Names, Revised (URNbis) -- Draft Proposed WG Charter ======================================== Last Modified: 2010-04-26 [AH] Chair(s): o Juha Hakala <juha.hakala <at> helsinki.fi> o N.N. Applications Area Director(s): o Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov <at> isode.com> o Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter <at> stpeter.im> Applications Area Advisor: o Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter <at> stpeter.im> Mailing Lists: General Discussion: urn <at> ietf.org To Subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn/current/maillist.html Related lists (used for IANA registration procedures (BCP 35/66): urn-nid <at> ietf.org, uri-review <at> ietf.org Additional information will be available at: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/urnbis Description of Working Group: Uniform Resource Names (URNs) are persistent identifiers for information resources. The RFCs defining URNs and services based on them were published 1997-2001. Since then, the URN system has gained popularity. Among the more traditional parties with deep interest in persistent identifiers and making heavy use of URNs are national libraries; solely within this area, tens of millions of resources have been assigned URNs; this enables efficient searching of and persistent linking to these documents. This working group is chartered to revise the key RFCs describing the URN system, including RFC 2141 (URN Syntax) and RFC 4306 (Namespace Definition Mechanisms), update important URN namespace specifications, and to screen and update RFCs describing URN resolution principles and practices. For RFC 2141, this revision will include in particular: an update of the formal syntax specification in the light of the URI Standard (STD 66, RFC 3986) using the ABNF from STD 68 (RFC 5234), a revision of URN examples from imaginary ones into existing URNs in current namespaces, providing a formal IANA registration for the 'urn' URI scheme using the template from BCP 35 (RFC 4395), and an update of the section describing how URNs are resolved in the Internet. RFC 4306 (BCP 66) needs a less pervasive update, mostly to align it with the current IANA procedures and terminology as defined in BCP 26 (RFC 5226). Regarding URN Namespace specifications, the WG will focus on updates for the definitions of URNs based on bibliographic identifier systems, in particular RFC 3187 (URN Namespace for International Standard Book Numbers) and RFC 3188 (URN Namespace for National Bibliography Numbers). In both cases, the respective identifier system and/or the institutions and roles involved in their assignment and resolution have evolved significantly since these RFCs have been published. In particular, the URN:ISBN namespace needs to be extended according to the revision of the international ISBN standard, and the usage of the URN:NBNs has grown rapidly and there is a need to align the namespace registration with experience and current practice. In a second stage, RFC 3044 (URN Namespace for International Series Standard Number) will be checked for the necessity of an update. Thus, in support of the current international efforts to establish a distributed, linked system of URN resolution systems for bibliographic identifiers, the primary aim of the WG is an updated set of standards documents, which is needed to assure uniformity and interoperability of the URN resolution services. Alongside the modernization of these core RFCs for URNs and specific URN namespaces, the working group will also consider a revision of earlier RFCs related to the principles of URNs and URN resolution, such as RFC 2483 (URI Resolution services necessary for URN resolution), RFC 2276 (Architectural principles of Uniform Resource Name Resolution), RFC 1737 (Functional requirements for Uniform Resource Names) and RFC 2169 (A trivial convention for using HTTP in URN resolution). All these must be checked; if the document is still deemed relevant, it will be modernized. The working group will also consider the possibility of publishing Best Current Practices on how to resolve the URNs utilizing the existing Internet protocols such as HTTP. This BCP will be based on the European URN resolution infrastructure under construction in the project PersID. Since the revised specifications will be based on existing production systems and provide important guidelines for future implementers, the WG aims at publishing the RFCs on the Standards Track and will try to advance the core document at least to Draft Standard status as fast as possible. The WG can take on work to update other well-established URN namespace definitions upon a case-by-case decision. Input documents: RFC 2141 RFC 3406 RFC 3187 RFC 3188 RFC 2483 RFC 2276 RFC 1737 RFC 2169 Goals and Milestones (preliminary): Feb 2010 Initial WG formation as 'URN-R' (outside the IETF) Mar 2010 WG work plan completed, brought to IETF APP Area May 2010 first Internet-Drafts for most important core document revisions Jul 2010 Presentation of the group & early results at IETF 78 (BoF) Aug 2010 Formal establishment of the IETF WG Dec 2010 WG Last Call on WG core document set Feb 2011 core document set forwarded to IESG 2011 work on supporting documents (guidelines, URN resolution) 2012 implementation report for promoting 2141bis to Draft Std. Internet-Drafts: draft-ah-rfc2141bis-urn (-00: March 2010) draft-hakala-rfc3187bis-isbn-urn (-00: March 2010) draft-hakala-rfc3188bis-nbn-urn (-00 due for week 18/2010) Request For Comments: none so far _______________________________________________ urn mailing list urn <at> ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
RSS Feed