Son-of-1036

The RFC Editor is proceeding with the draft I submitted in May. It will be
a Historic RFC as we had asked, but they want a line below that to state
that it is "Superseded by RFC5536 and RFC5537" (that is in addition to the
clear warnings in the Abstract and in the Preface to the effect that the
document is NOT to be considered as a basis for current implementations).
They also asked for a mention that RFC822 is now replaced by 5532.

Is there anything else that might cause confusion and that should be
warned against?

--

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131            Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl <at> clerew.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5