6 Apr 2003 04:40
RE: Ordered collections and versioned collections
Clemm, Geoff <gclemm <at> rational.com>
2003-04-06 02:40:41 GMT
2003-04-06 02:40:41 GMT
From: Lisa Dusseault [mailto:lisa <at> xythos.com] It seems from draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-07 that only version-controlled resources are part of the ordering of version-controlled collections (Section 9: "for compatibility with RFC3253, only the ordering of version-controlled members needs to be maintained") Does that mean there's no way to order versioned and unversioned resources together within a version-controlled collection? That is correct. The issue is that when you UPDATE a version-controlled collection with a new version, it can change the set of version-controlled members, and there would not be a way to define what the ordering of the existing non-version-controlled members should be wrt the new version-controlled members. Cheers, Geoff
RSS Feed