3 Dec 2002 13:56
RE: OCSP I-Ds going forward
Tom Gindin <tgindin <at> us.ibm.com>
2002-12-03 12:56:10 GMT
2002-12-03 12:56:10 GMT
What I am suggesting is that those four existing structures are the
only ones needed, that no more than two of them are ever needed in the same
request, and that the only useful combinations of two in a single request
are those of CertID with one of the others. The reasons for this made up
most of my posting yesterday.
Tom Gindin
"Michael Myers" <myers <at> coastside.net> on 12/02/2002 06:01:49 PM
To: Tom Gindin/Watson/IBM <at> IBMUS
cc: "Phillip H. Griffin" <phil.griffin <at> asn-1.com>, "Peter Gutmann"
<pgut001 <at> cs.auckland.ac.nz>, <Denis.Pinkas <at> bull.net>,
<ietf-pkix <at> imc.org>
Subject: RE: OCSP I-Ds going forward
Tom,
Am I correct in inferring that your are advocating:
> This reduces the matrix to four single fields
> (CertID, fullCertificate, issuerSerial, and ESSCertID)
Mike
RSS Feed