Stephen Kent | 2 Apr 2011 10:44
Picon

Re: IETF 80: The future of PKIX certificate enrollment protocols

At 4:50 PM -0600 4/1/11, max pritikin wrote:
>I agree with these comments.
>
>A sufficiently restricted profile of CMP would be an improvement 
>regarding interoperability but would still be significantly more 
>complex than simply depending on TLS as a secure transport.
>
>- max

Max,

As I noted during the PKIX meeting, one concern about relying on TLS is
that most TLS implementations are pretty poor re PKI details. Thus using
TLS as a building block for cert issuance will have to be very 
carefully vetted.

Steve
_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list
pkix <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix


Gmane