3 Aug 2012 11:09
OCSP algorithm agility: criticality?
Simon Josefsson <simon <at> josefsson.org>
2012-08-03 09:09:26 GMT
2012-08-03 09:09:26 GMT
All, For the RFC2560 update, I reviewed the text copied from RFC 6277 and noticed that it is silent on whether the client extension should or could be marked as critical or not. Is there some guidance on what a client should specify? Is this something that an implementer can chose, or should this be something an administrator or user should be able to specify? I'm guessing that in most situations you would want the extension non-critical, but I wouldn't rule out situations where the client would want to require the OCSP responder to support this extension. Does that reflect what others believe? And finally, does any of these considerations belong in 2560bis? /Simon _______________________________________________ pkix mailing list pkix <at> ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
RSS Feed