Re: Surveillance and legal privilege

Brian Morrison said:
>> lawful surveillance of privileged communications with lawyers
> I can't imagine how any such thing is possible under any circumstances.
> Surely privilege means exactly what it says?

"There is no confidence in iniquity". For example, if the lawyer is crooked
and the communications are for the purpose of hiding the proceeds of a
crime, why should they be protected?

--

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather          | If you lie to the compiler,
Email: clive@...     | it will get its revenge.
Web: http://www.davros.org  |   - Henry Spencer
Mobile: +44 7973 377646