Re: Discussion: Possible GR: Enhance requirements for General Resolutions

This one time, at band camp, Kalle Kivimaa said:
> Joerg Jaspert <joerg <at> debian.org> writes:
> >  a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor
> >     a resolution, but floor(2Q). [see §4.2(1)]
> 
> This would mean that you need almost as many sponsors as is required
> for the quorum (2Q vs 3Q). I think that is too much. I think floor(Q)
> sponsors would be a more appropriate number.

That just means that the number of people who think the vote is even
worth having is not that different to the number of votes required to
make it valid.  That's probably not all that bad a thing, IMHO.
--

-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
|   ,''`.                                            Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :                                        sgran <at> debian.org |
|  `. `'                        Debian user, admin, and developer |
|    `-                                     http://www.debian.org |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------