Re: Amendment to: reduce the length of DPL election process

On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:25:11AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius <liw <at> liw.iki.fi> wrote:
> > I, as a voter, would also like to have ample time for discussion about
> > various topics after the IRC debate. [...] a week for discussion
> > really does sound to me like too little time.
> 
> Note that there could still be up to three weeks for discussion after
> the IRC debate but before voting closes.

No! We have a campaigning period for a reason. What you suggest implies
campaigning during the voting period, which is against the spirit, if
not the letter, of the procedure.

--

-- 
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
  -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22