2 Mar 2011 10:47
Re: A Debian -offtopic mailing list: to be or not to be
Scott Ferguson <prettyfly.productions <at> gmail.com>
2011-03-02 09:47:47 GMT
2011-03-02 09:47:47 GMT
On 02/03/11 11:59, Chris Jones wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:10:01AM EST, Andrei Popescu wrote: >> On Lu, 28 feb 11, 22:47:17, Chris Jones wrote: > >>> So what do I do..? recommend we continue our heated discussion on >>> the OT mailing list..? too bad.. she's not subscribed to D-OT .. and >>> given the circumstances and our disagreement.. no way she's going to >>> go through all the trouble of subscribing.. >> >> That shouldn't be a problem, the list is setup as close as possible[1] >> to debian-user: posting open, no reply-to munging, etc. so all you >> would need to do to move a discussion is reply-to-all and replace d-u >> with d-OT. > > Well, I did just that about two hours ago.. hit āgā reply-to-group, > which is the closest to reply-all I could find.. and changed d-u to > d-ot.. and all I got was something in my inbox to the effect that my > message was undeliverable.. So depending on your mailer, I'm skeptical > things are that simple. > > In any case.. even if the above had worked.. it would only have posted > my particular post to d-OT.. what about the previous OT messages that > were initially posted to D-U and would be essentialto anyone > catching up understanding what I am talking about..? And how does it > guarantee that whoever takes a fancy to the OT thread while reading > debian-user would post to debian-OT.. rather than follow the simplest > course of action and post to debian-user..? > > cj > > </cloak>(sigh) Which I guess means we'll have to rely upon the good nature and judgement of others to preface their subject lines with [OT] when they want to chat about "my favourite desktop distro" and "yet another survey". At least then I/we can use filters to move those posts (and any containing the word Ubuntu) to another mail folder. I know - those poster do use debian, or kind-of, but at least that would/will allow those that subscribe to read about the use of debian more signal-noise. It also makes searching personal archives of debian-user for answers more relevant. <cloak> Cheers --- Don't confuse lack of enthusiasm for an OT list for enthusiastic support of OT posts -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST <at> lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster <at> lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4D6E1243.7060304 <at> gmail.com
to anyone
> catching up understanding what I am talking about..? And how does it
> guarantee that whoever takes a fancy to the OT thread while reading
> debian-user would post to debian-OT.. rather than follow the simplest
> course of action and post to debian-user..?
>
> cj
>
>
</cloak>(sigh) Which I guess means we'll have to rely upon the good
nature and judgement of others to preface their subject lines with [OT]
when they want to chat about "my favourite desktop distro" and "yet
another survey". At least then I/we can use filters to move those posts
(and any containing the word Ubuntu) to another mail folder.
I know - those poster do use debian, or kind-of, but at least that
would/will allow those that subscribe to read about the use of debian
more signal-noise.
It also makes searching personal archives of debian-user for answers
more relevant.
<cloak>
Cheers
---
Don't confuse lack of enthusiasm for an OT list for enthusiastic support
of OT posts
RSS Feed