David: Re: NVidia Debian thread

Hey David,

I apologize.  This response does not convey the respect I have for you.  I 
didn't like being made the fool, but I need to control my fingers better.

Matt

On Wednesday 31 January 2007 20:47, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 January 2007 10:13, David Bandel wrote:
> > please re-read carefully what I said (are you and echo?)
>
> No need to be snotty.  I wasn't sure what your point was, since either you
> were not being clear (yes, I skipped over some of what you wrote) or you
> were simply showing off and not contributing pertinent information.
>
> > > telinit on Linux seems to (or did when I learned about it) more cleanly
> > > change runlevels.  Perhaps that is no longer the case.
> >
> > If you RTFM and/or the source, you will see that calling init as
> > telinit acts appropriately (as I said above).
> >
> > In all cases, "acts appropriately" as I stated in my initial message
> > means that its behavior is different depending on $0.  Sorry I didn't
> > go into greater detail for you.  Didn't think it necessary.
>
> indeed.

-- 
Matthew Carpenter
mcarpenter <at> intelguardians.com
http://www.intelguardians.com

PGP Fingerprint: 
87EB 54A8 FB42 0A0E B8AE CDA7 FF99 2A64 E70F 4466
hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net

Hey David,

I apologize.  This response does not convey the respect I have for you.  I 
didn't like being made the fool, but I need to control my fingers better.

Matt

On Wednesday 31 January 2007 20:47, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 January 2007 10:13, David Bandel wrote:
> > please re-read carefully what I said (are you and echo?)
>
> No need to be snotty.  I wasn't sure what your point was, since either you
> were not being clear (yes, I skipped over some of what you wrote) or you
> were simply showing off and not contributing pertinent information.
>
> > > telinit on Linux seems to (or did when I learned about it) more cleanly
> > > change runlevels.  Perhaps that is no longer the case.
> >
> > If you RTFM and/or the source, you will see that calling init as
> > telinit acts appropriately (as I said above).
> >
> > In all cases, "acts appropriately" as I stated in my initial message
> > means that its behavior is different depending on $0.  Sorry I didn't
> > go into greater detail for you.  Didn't think it necessary.
>
> indeed.

--

-- 
Matthew Carpenter
mcarpenter <at> intelguardians.com
http://www.intelguardians.com

PGP Fingerprint: 
87EB 54A8 FB42 0A0E B8AE CDA7 FF99 2A64 E70F 4466
hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net