Re: IBM article of interest ?

Josh Saddler wrote:
>> Yes, it looks as if someone at IBM simply copied it from there,
>> where it is indeed marked "updated".
> 
> Perhaps you misunderstand -- the articles originally were written *for 
> developerWorks*, not for Gentoo. That's where they first appeared 7 or 8 
> years ago.

And that's also why Philip should thank IBM instead of pestering them :).

Cheers,
-jkt

--

-- 
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth