18 Jul 16:30
Re: system set no longer in part of world set
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: system set no longer in part of world set
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.devel
Date: 2008-07-18 14:30:20 GMT
Subject: Re: system set no longer in part of world set
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.devel
Date: 2008-07-18 14:30:20 GMT
2008-07-18 16:01:28 Doug Goldstein napisaÅ‚(a): > Olivier Crête wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 18:01 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > > > >> This brings out the fun of circular depends. I don't really know how to > >> address this but a lot of packages are going to have to be updated to > >> contain proper depends. i.e. C based apps will need > >> RDEPEND="virtual/libc". C++ packages will need a stdc++ depend. > >> > > > > Adding a dep to libc almost everywhere seems extremely wrong to me. I > > though we had decided many times that it was a bad idea. > > > > > Yes. Adding libc everywhere is wrong. However, if you don't have one of > the packages listed here [1], your libc won't ever update. IMHO it would be better to teach users to explicitly specify '@system' during updates, e.g. `emerge -uDN @system @world`. -- -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
RSS Feed