19 Jul 00:38
Re: strange portage behaviour
From: Zac Medico <zmedico <at> gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: strange portage behaviour
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.devel
Date: 2008-07-18 22:38:42 GMT
Subject: Re: strange portage behaviour
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.devel
Date: 2008-07-18 22:38:42 GMT
Alin Năstac wrote: > Portage no longer install ._cfg0000_* files for the CONFIG_PROTECTed > files touched by the user. Even if I remove the package and reinstall it > again, the protected file will remain like it is. > > Can someone enlighten me? > It's common for people get get confused like this by the "confmem" behavior that's built into portage's merge process. You can use --noconfmem to disable it. In newer versions of portage (those not marked stable yet), uninstalling a package or downgrading it will automatically trigger behavior like --noconfmem [1], so hopefully this will help to avoid some confusion in the future. Zac [1] http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage?rev=10250&view=rev
RSS Feed