Nate Bargmann | 6 Mar 2009 23:23

Re: Migration from CVS to Subversion

On Friday 06 March 2009 13:17:51 Stelios Bounanos wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 06:19:04 -0600, Nate Bargmann
> >>>>> <n0nb <at> bluevalley.net> said:
> >
> > For those of us who need to get up to speed on SVN (I played with it
> > locally a few years ago so I need to refresh my memory), here are a
> > couple links:
> >
> > Help for SourceForge:
> > http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Subversion%20client%20inst
> >ructions
> >
> > The official SVN book:
> > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
>
> I'm surprised that you're not migrating to git:
>
>   http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git

I saw that last week in an email from SF.net.  I wouldn't have been opposed to 
moving straight to Git since I have to (re)learn a new SCM anyway.  :D  I do 
think that SVN is a huge improvement over CVS based on what little I was able 
to read this morning.

Am I misreading some Google hits, but is there some method of cross 
functionality between SVN and Git, one way or both way?

73, de Nate >>

--

-- 

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."

Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://n0nb.us/index.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H

Gmane