6 Mar 2009 23:23
Re: Migration from CVS to Subversion
Nate Bargmann <n0nb <at> bluevalley.net>
2009-03-06 22:23:08 GMT
2009-03-06 22:23:08 GMT
On Friday 06 March 2009 13:17:51 Stelios Bounanos wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 06:19:04 -0600, Nate Bargmann > >>>>> <n0nb <at> bluevalley.net> said: > > > > For those of us who need to get up to speed on SVN (I played with it > > locally a few years ago so I need to refresh my memory), here are a > > couple links: > > > > Help for SourceForge: > > http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Subversion%20client%20inst > >ructions > > > > The official SVN book: > > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/ > > I'm surprised that you're not migrating to git: > > http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git I saw that last week in an email from SF.net. I wouldn't have been opposed to moving straight to Git since I have to (re)learn a new SCM anyway. :D I do think that SVN is a huge improvement over CVS based on what little I was able to read this morning. Am I misreading some Google hits, but is there some method of cross functionality between SVN and Git, one way or both way? 73, de Nate >> -- -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://n0nb.us/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
RSS Feed