11 Jul 03:02
Re: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
From: Matthew Hawkins <darthmdh <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel.ck, gmane.linux.kernel, gmane.linux.kernel.mm
Date: 2007-07-11 01:02:56 GMT
Subject: Re: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel.ck, gmane.linux.kernel, gmane.linux.kernel.mm
Date: 2007-07-11 01:02:56 GMT
On 7/10/07, Con Kolivas <kernel <at> kolivas.org> wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 18:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
> When replying, please rewrite the subject suitably and try to Cc: the
> appropriate developer(s).
~swap prefetch
[snip]
Put me and the users out of our misery and merge it now
For the record; it merges, builds, and runs cleanly on x86_64 vanilla+CFS provided sched-add_above_background_load is also merged (you need the old one that adds an inline to sched.h, not the new one that depends on SD-isms). I believe that is already merged with -mm anyway.
I'd also be interested to see if there is a better way of doing what above_background_load() does with CFS, I think v18 added some functionality along these lines...
We all know swap prefetch has been tested out the wazoo since Moses was a little boy, is compile-time and runtime selectable, and gives an important and quantifiable performance increase to desktop systems. Save a Redhat employee some time reinventing the wheel and just merge it. This wheel already has dope 21" rims, homes
--
Matt
<div> <p>On 7/10/07, Con Kolivas <<a href="mailto:kernel <at> kolivas.org">kernel <at> kolivas.org</a>> wrote:</p> <div> <span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> On Tuesday 10 July 2007 18:31, Andrew Morton wrote:<br>> When replying, please rewrite the subject suitably and try to Cc: the<br>> appropriate developer(s).<br><br>~swap prefetch</blockquote> <div>[snip] <br> </div>Put me and the users out of our misery and merge it now </div>[snip]<br><br>For the record; it merges, builds, and runs cleanly on x86_64 vanilla+CFS provided sched-add_above_background_load is also merged (you need the old one that adds an inline to sched.h, not the new one that depends on SD-isms). I believe that is already merged with -mm anyway. <br clear="all"><br>I'd also be interested to see if there is a better way of doing what above_background_load() does with CFS, I think v18 added some functionality along these lines...<br><br>We all know swap prefetch has been tested out the wazoo since Moses was a little boy, is compile-time and runtime selectable, and gives an important and quantifiable performance increase to desktop systems. Save a Redhat employee some time reinventing the wheel and just merge it. This wheel already has dope 21" rims, homes<br><br>-- <br>Matt </div>
RSS Feed