8 Oct 2004 18:52
Re: [RFC] memory defragmentation to satisfy high order allocations
Hirokazu Takahashi <taka <at> valinux.co.jp>
2004-10-08 16:52:39 GMT
2004-10-08 16:52:39 GMT
Hi, Marcelo. > > > > > That is, if we can't migrate the page, try to write it out? > > > > > > I just didnt understand the logic very well, maybe I should just > > > go reread the code. > > > > > > Thanks! > > I'm thinking about how to implement a nonblocking version of generic_migrate_page(). > > For this purpose its really bad to allocate swap space to anonymous pages, well > need to figure out someother way of blocking the users via pagetablefault. > > Like a "virtual" swap space but without allocating swap map space. I've also ever thought to implement such a device. It would be nice if you can design it simple. Mr.Iwamoto thought otherwise and posted another opinion on the lhms list, though. I felt it also has a point. iwamoto> I don't think requiring swap is a big deal. If you don't have a iwamoto> dedicated swap device, which case I think unusual, you can swapon a iwamoto> regular file. Thanks, Hirokazu Takahashi. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo <at> kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart <at> kvack.org"> aart <at> kvack.org </a>
RSS Feed