Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging

On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:27:06PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> min_free_kbytes? This number really isn't anything to do with balancing
> and more to do with the amount of reserve kept for things like GFP_ATOMIC
> and recursive allocations. Let's not lower it ;)

Agreed. Or at the very least that should be discussed in a separate
thread, it has no relation with shrink_cache changes or anything else
related to zone aging IMHO.