Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] ARM: sh-mobile: mackerel: Add error IRQ resource

On Thursday, May 03, 2012, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 11:29 +0200, Bastian Hecht wrote:
> > 
> > Am 03.05.2012 08:01 schrieb "Artem Bityutskiy" <dedekind1 <at> gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 09:00 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 22:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, May 02, 2012, Bastian Hecht wrote:
> > > > > > Supply the platform data for the FLSTEI error IRQ.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bastian Hecht <hechtb <at> gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm going to take this patch into the renesas.git tree and push
> > it
> > > > > upstream throuch arm-soc, if that's not a problem.
> > > >
> > > > It is already in the MTD tree with the rest of the 10 patches...
> > >
> > > Ops, sorry, this is not true. Then Bastian should separate it out
> > and
> > > not send it to the MTD tree.
> > 
> > Alright I'll do. I need to fix the compiler warnings of the mtd
> > patches anyway. So the board code is independant and can be pushed
> > already by Rafael, right? How is it supposed to work in general? I
> > think the sh-mobile list wants to be informed when I change something
> > in the flctl code. Would the right approach be to send 2 patchsets -
> > posted on both MLs so that Artem can take the mtd portions and Rafael
> > the mackerel ones?
> 
> If the patches are completely independent, post them separately.

Yes, please.

> I think it is also OK to CC more than one mailing list.

Yes, it is.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
the body of a message to majordomo <at> vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html