1 Feb 2005 16:26
Re: SKAS3: prerelease of V8 (against 2.6.9) uploaded
Frank Sorenson <frank <at> tuxrocks.com>
2005-02-01 15:26:31 GMT
2005-02-01 15:26:31 GMT
Rob Landley wrote: | If a kill -9 needs to be followed by a CONT signal to actually take effect on | a stopped process, why is this not a kernel bug? (Kill -9 is supposed to | _mean_ it. I've always thought of it as the "with shotgun" option...) | | Rob I believe there were PTRACE changes in 2.6.9 that caused this: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109877438509709&w=2 Frank -- Frank Sorenson - KD7TZK Systems Manager, Computer Science Department Brigham Young University frank <at> tuxrocks.com
RSS Feed