29 Feb 2012 17:50
Re: [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24
Tony Houghton <h <at> realh.co.uk>
2012-02-29 16:50:27 GMT
2012-02-29 16:50:27 GMT
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:48:33 +0100 Manuel Reimer <manuel.reimer <at> gmx.de> wrote: > Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > > Yes, the next stable version will be 2.0. > > Version 1.0 was the "SD version", and version 2.0 shall be the "HD > > version". > > > > I'll see to make "client/server" a priority after that. > > What does this mean? Do you plan built-in networking support or do > you plan to improve streamdev? IMHO it is a big task to make really > good networking support. Keeping this code separate (means: A plugin) > isn't a that bad idea, I think. Of course, this plugin could be > delivered directly with VDR, like the other "built-in" plugins. I don't think a plugin is enough. For better client-server VDR needs to support multiple clients watching different channels with different OSDs simultaneously. _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr <at> linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
.
> >
> > I'll see to make "client/server" a priority after that.
>
> What does this mean? Do you plan built-in networking support or do
> you plan to improve streamdev? IMHO it is a big task to make really
> good networking support. Keeping this code separate (means: A plugin)
> isn't a that bad idea, I think. Of course, this plugin could be
> delivered directly with VDR, like the other "built-in" plugins.
I don't think a plugin is enough. For better client-server VDR
needs to support multiple clients watching different channels with
different OSDs simultaneously.
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr <at> linuxtv.org
RSS Feed