Re: curry and rcurry -> papply and rpapply?

>> Alright, but don't you agree that partial-apply and esp.
>> reverse-partial-apply are names that are too long for such
>> a basic function?
>
> No. Clarity is far more important than being terse: they are no slower
> to read, and meaning is that much more immediately obvious. Note

if people second the other opinion, then i feel that i must speak up
on behalf of the non-abbreviation group.

the need for abbreviation (if any) should be satisfied by a tool (the
editor), not a library.

--

-- 
 attila