4 Apr 2010 17:39
Re: Unicode, CHAR-UPCASE/CHAR-DOWNCASE and char-upcase.1/char-upcase.2
Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus <at> random-state.net>
2010-04-04 15:39:08 GMT
2010-04-04 15:39:08 GMT
On 4 April 2010 15:04, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels <at> gmail.com> wrote: > I think now that the tests are correct, but that the requirement in > the CLHS is out-dated. However, that's something to address in the > implementation itself. I'll discuss on the ABCL list. I would suggest that it is better to provide EXT:UNICODE-UPCASE or similar, instead of making standard functions behave in a manner not consistent with the spec. Cheers, -- Nikodemus
RSS Feed