On 4 April 2010 15:04, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> I think now that the tests are correct, but that the requirement in
> the CLHS is out-dated. However, that's something to address in the
> implementation itself. I'll discuss on the ABCL list.
I would suggest that it is better to provide
or similar, instead of making standard functions behave in a manner
not consistent with the spec.