On 4/14/10 4:57 PM, Sam Steingold wrote:
> On 4/14/10, Raymond Toy wrote:
>> Couldn't just test if character is a subtypep of base-char? (I.e.,
>> types are equal)
> there is no such requirement.
You misunderstood. If character is a subtypep of base-char, then a
string is a vector of character, otherwise a string is not a vector of
character But I guess this might be wrong if nil vectors are strings.
CMUCL doesn't treat nil vectors as strings.