Re: STRING-IS-NOT-VECTOR-OF-CHARACTER.1

On 4/14/10 4:57 PM, Sam Steingold wrote:
> On 4/14/10, Raymond Toy <toy.raymond <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Couldn't just test if character is a subtypep of base-char?  (I.e.,
>>  types are equal)
>>     
> there is no such requirement.
>   
You misunderstood.  If character is a subtypep of base-char, then a
string is a vector of character, otherwise a string is not a vector of
character  But I guess this might be wrong if nil vectors are strings. 
CMUCL doesn't treat nil vectors as strings.

Ray