Re: unnamed callback (closures?)

Jan Rychter <jan <at> rychter.com> writes:
> Apart from a plea for suggestions, this brings me back to my original
> question -- can we expect any support for anonymous callbacks (closures
> as callback functions) in CFFI, at least on SBCL to begin with?

I'm pretty sure we could support anonymous callbacks, on SBCL and CLISP
anyway. Do any other Lisps support this?

--

-- 
Luís Oliveira
luismbo ( <at> ) gmail (.) com
Equipa Portuguesa do Translation Project
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/registry.cgi?team=pt