Minor bug in edit-callers under lispworks;

   From: Alain Picard <Alain.Picard <at> memetrics.com>
   Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:05:59 +1000

   >>>>> Bob Rogers writes:

   Bob> This also means that LW doesn't take advantage of the new M-. code,
   Bob> because I couldn't port the Lisp end of the implementation to Lispworks.
   Bob> The code is in find-src.lisp, if you (or anyone else) is willing to have
   Bob> a go at it.  See also the edit-definitions-notes.text file.  It's
   Bob> probably not a small job, but shouldn't be a huge one, either.

   AAAAAAUUUUUUGGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!!!                    

   That's why I upgraded to the latest CVS sources, and it DOESN'T
   WORK?!??!???

   After reading about all this cool new stuff you had been doing, I was
   drooling...

Guess I should have put in bigger disclaimers . . . perhaps my commit
log comments were a bit, ah, terse . . .  :-/

   Okay, I might have a crack at it for LW, but don't hold
   your breath, I don't get a lot of time for hacking these days...

I had thought of offering to do it if someone wanted to buy me a copy of
LW, or give me SSH access to a suitable box, but I'm in the same boat re
time.  It bothered me when patching it in that I had had only two Lisps
to try it on, CMUCL and ACL (plus SBCL, which is still too close to
CMUCL to be an independent port).  But I suppose that's an unavoidable
drawback of trying to support every Lisp under the sun -- nobody can
develop/test on anything close to all supported configurations.

   In any case, if you do get the time, I'd be happy to field any
questions that come up.

   Welcome to the bleeding edge.  ;-}

					-- Bob

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01