Re: Old topic again: Option to avoid fsync()?

Michael Haardt wrote:
> Any other opinions than "enforce fsync, because it works for me"?

If this can be done without impacting those that doesn't want to use the 
feature, I don't think there's much of an argument against it. As has 
been pointed out before, Exim already gives you an almost infinite 
number of ways to shoot yourself (or others) in the foot. Given that 
there are legitimate use-cases for this functionality, I'd vote to 
include it.

Personally I may find it useful for my spamtrap MX, which is handling 
close to 200k messages/week.

	Bob

--

--