5 Jul 2005 11:48
Re: sqlite lookup support.
Tony Finch <dot <at> dotat.at>
2005-07-05 09:48:40 GMT
2005-07-05 09:48:40 GMT
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I thought about that but didn't know what form to provide documentation > patches in. I sort of tuned out of the docs discussion when it started > to mention XML.It's sufficient to provide a patch for the NewStuff file which is plain text. > Yeah. It could probably also do with being marked as a query-style > lookup, but you can't use filenames with query-style lookups at the > moment; I suspect we should have a separate flag to indicate whether a > filename is required or not. Yes, it's a bit odd that it's a hybrid between a query-styl and single-key lookup. Judging from the patch this is a documentation problem rather than an implementation problem, but I only skimmed it. Tony. -- <fanf <at> exim.org> <dot <at> dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- --
It's sufficient to provide a patch for the NewStuff file which is plain
text.
> Yeah. It could probably also do with being marked as a query-style
> lookup, but you can't use filenames with query-style lookups at the
> moment; I suspect we should have a separate flag to indicate whether a
> filename is required or not.
Yes, it's a bit odd that it's a hybrid between a query-styl and single-key
lookup. Judging from the patch this is a documentation problem rather than
an implementation problem, but I only skimmed it.
Tony.
--
<fanf <at> exim.org> <dot <at> dotat.at>
RSS Feed