1 Jun 22:17
Re: use dotted syntax for package version info
From: Bill Wohler <wohler <at> newt.com>
Subject: Re: use dotted syntax for package version info
Newsgroups: gmane.mail.mh-e.devel
Date: 2008-06-01 20:17:04 GMT
Subject: Re: use dotted syntax for package version info
Newsgroups: gmane.mail.mh-e.devel
Date: 2008-06-01 20:17:04 GMT
John Paul Wallington <jpw <at> pobox.com> wrote: > How about using dotted syntax for package version info throughout for > consistency's sake? > > 2008-05-31 John Paul Wallington <jpw <at> pobox.com> > > * mh-e.el (mh-path, mh-variant): Use dotted syntax for > `package-version' info. > > Index: lisp/mh-e/mh-e.el > =================================================================== > RCS file: /sources/emacs/emacs/lisp/mh-e/mh-e.el,v > retrieving revision 1.123 > diff -u -r1.123 mh-e.el > --- lisp/mh-e/mh-e.el 27 May 2008 00:00:22 -0000 1.123 > +++ lisp/mh-e/mh-e.el 31 May 2008 18:20:48 -0000 > @@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ > See `mh-variant'." > :group 'mh-e > :type '(repeat (directory)) > - :package-version '(MH-E "8.0")) > + :package-version '(MH-E . "8.0")) > > (defun mh-variants () > "Return a list of installed variants of MH on the system. > @@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ > (set-default symbol value) ;Done in mh-variant-set-variant! > (mh-variant-set value)) > :group 'mh-e > - :package-version '(MH-E "8.0")) > + :package-version '(MH-E . "8.0")) I agree. Thanks very much for catching that detail. Can you check this in? -- -- Bill Wohler <wohler <at> newt.com> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
RSS Feed