Re: "r", "R"

Hi Bill,

> One implementation would be to leave r as it is,
> honoring the value of mh-reply-default-reply-to
> and maintaining backwards compatibility. Then,
> add an R command that sets
> mh-reply-default-reply-to to "all". You could
> then set mh-reply-default-reply-to to "to" and
> have the behavior you desire.

I guess I have no objections to this approach.

Are you planning to add some kind of
mh-reply-to-all function which may be bound to the
R command? (see the untested mh-reply-to-all code
after my .signature).

Or was that could going to be left as an exercise
to the reader?

	Curious,
	-- Mark

(defun mh-reply-to-all (message &optional includep)
  "Reply to a MESSAGE.

A wrapper around `mh-reply' passing \"all\" as the reply-to option.

See also `mh-reply', `mh-reply-show-message-flag',
`mh-reply-default-reply-to', and `mh-send'."
  (interactive (list (mh-get-msg-num t) current-prefix-arg))
  (mh-reply message "all" includep))

(define-key mh-folder-mode-map "R" 'mh-reply-to-all)