Re: "r", "R"

Greg Minshall <minshall <at> acm.org> wrote:

> i can understand two (contradictory) things from your suggestion.  one,
> "R", followed by "r": the "r" would do reply to all.  second, "R",
> followed by "r": the "r" would continue to work as it currently does.

Sorry for the confusion. I meant that "r" would continue to work as it
does now, and R would be reply all.

> i'd vote for the second (where R sets a *local* ("let
> ((mh-reply-default-reply-to...))") variable).

Is there a second? Anyone opposed?

--

-- 
Bill Wohler <wohler <at> newt.com>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/