Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?

    0n Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:01:38PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: 

    >Yes and no. Mutt is not multithreaded, so you can't have it handle the 
    >SMTP connection in the background, so, NO. But if you really want it 
    >backgrounded, why not use a simple SMTP sender (like msmtp or 
    >nullmailer or something similar) instead of have mutt do it? That way 
    >you *can* background email sending.

Is msmtp completely independent of a local MTA ? i.e. I would no longer need
to use my local sendmail for smart-relay anymore ?

 -aW

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the
jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914.  If you have received this email in error, you are
requested to contact the sender and delete the email.