Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?

* Wilkinson, Alex <alex.wilkinson <at> dsto.defence.gov.au> [05-18-2008]:

>     0n Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:01:38PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: 
> 
>     >Yes and no. Mutt is not multithreaded, so you can't have it handle the 
>     >SMTP connection in the background, so, NO. But if you really want it 
>     >backgrounded, why not use a simple SMTP sender (like msmtp or 
>     >nullmailer or something similar) instead of have mutt do it? That way 
>     >you *can* background email sending.
> 
> Is msmtp completely independent of a local MTA ? i.e. I would no longer need
> to use my local sendmail for smart-relay anymore ?

Correct. 

--

-- 
Sahil Tandon <sahil <at> tandon.net>