3 Jul 11:35
Re: backscatter
R Johnson <zen158416 <at> zen.co.uk>
2009-07-03 09:35:02 GMT
2009-07-03 09:35:02 GMT
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 10:23 +0100, kj wrote: > K bharathan wrote: > > the following is the log from my gateway to a subdomain; there are lot > > <> sender mails are going; is it backscatter?; some are rejected on the > > basis of header-checks; the owner of the subdomain has got a mail > > server; how can i prevent this > > It becomes backscatter if the recipient server rejects the mail and > you're stuck with it. So the solution is simple: don't relay mail for > someone who doesn't accept all mail from you. Or work with them so that > you have the same header checks and other criteria, so that your server > will refuse to accept anything that their server will reject. > > Still, on their side, if they have a relay in front of them, they should > be accepting all mail from the relay and discard stuff they don't want, > instead of rejecting it. > > --kj What I suggest you do is set up some kind of forwarding for Postscatter so it is sent to: wietse <at> porcupine.org. I wish everyone who suffers Postscatter would do it. Then perhaps the ignorant retarded f&ckwit may get the fhking message.
RSS Feed