3 Jul 23:54
Re: MTA or SMTP proxy?
Victor Duchovni <Victor.Duchovni <at> morganstanley.com>
2009-07-03 21:54:55 GMT
2009-07-03 21:54:55 GMT
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 11:50:26PM +0200, mouss wrote:
>
> In theory at least, a final delivery MTA could deliver directly, without
> a queue. of course, there is the problem of privileges. but for example,
> on a system where the whole mailstore belongs to a single (virtual)
> uid:gid, then the final MTA can deliver directly to a maildir. some
> people even think this should be the way to deliver mail ("immediate
> delivery").
This cannot be atomically for multi-recipient mail. SMTP requires
a single response for all recipients after ".", this requires either:
- a Queue
OR
- an atomic multi-recipient final delivery mechanism.
So indeed SMTP (in the general case) does impose some constraints on
MTA queueing behaviour.
--
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo <at> postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
RSS Feed