Re: YET another CNAME_lookup_failed question [Charles]

Thanks. I really wanted your input. I will take a close look.
I appreciate it.

Regards,
Ariel Duran

On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 11:28, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Ariel Duran <duran <at> americatab.com> wrote:
> > Charles any ideas? I was wondering what you think about this issue. (;
> 
> I read the list; no need to send special messages with my name in them to get
> me to read your messages.  I didn't respond because I don't think you've
> researched this problem adequately.  From a previous message:
> 
> > dnscache log entry when trying to send a email to work. if send to
> > hotmail, it would yield a similar result.
> >
> > the last entry, which I think it is the result says:
> >
> > 2003-10-02 10:01:27.######### tx 0 12 99.2.168.192.in-addr.arpa.
> >     168.192.in-addr.arpa. c0af302a c0af3006
> > 2003-10-02 10:01:37.898425500 nxdomain c0af302a 3600
> 
> If you can explain why you think qmail would do a reverse-DNS lookup on
> 192.168.2.99 when trying to /send/ the message, I'd be more interested.
> Perhaps you should explain why you think qmail-send cares at all about
> reverse-DNS?
> 
> Or perhaps you mean you are actually trying to send the message /to/ your
> qmail server via SMTP and it's being refused at that time.  That is a totally
> different problem than the one you've actually stated, as far as I can tell.
> 
> Charles