Re: qmail in the public domain?

Matthew Dempsky writes:
 > There's a thread discussing Dan's ``Some thoughts on security after
 > ten years of qmail 1.0'' paper, but I haven't seen any mention on the
 > slides to the corresponding talk[1].  Namely, page 10 says:
 > 
 >     2007.11: $500 -> $1000;
 >     qmail placed into public domain.
 > 
 > Does this mean what I think it does?  

Yes.  So ... should we rename netqmail-1.05 to qmail-1.06 and include
SMTP-AUTH and TLS in it?

--

-- 
--my blog is at    http://blog.russnelson.com   | People have strong opinions
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | about economics even though
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241       | they've never studied it.
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  |     Sheepdog          | Curious how that is!