Re: qmail in the public domain?

John Gateley wrote:
> Yes to the SMTP-AUTH/TLS. No to the renaming. If qmail is in the public domain,
> anyone can release a qmail-1.06. netqmail already has brand recognition.
>
>   
I agree - netqmail-1.06 with TLS (with client certs support for both
qmail-smtpd and qmail-remote), and SMTP-AUTH (including qmail-remote),
and recipient checking (no-one should be running an edge SMTP server
without that these days [sorry Dan - that's the truth!]).

Also, was RFC-2821 support (i.e. making qmail try other MX records on
4XX status) ever made part of netqmail?

Hmmm, starting to sound like a wish list, MUST... RESIST!!!...

--

-- 
Cheers

Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1