Re: qmail in the public domain?

Jason Haar writes:
 > I agree - netqmail-1.06 with TLS (with client certs support for both
 > qmail-smtpd and qmail-remote), and SMTP-AUTH (including qmail-remote),
 > and recipient checking (no-one should be running an edge SMTP server
 > without that these days [sorry Dan - that's the truth!]).

Yes, JohnL asked for that, too.  And others have pointed out that
netqmail should persist.

 > Also, was RFC-2821 support (i.e. making qmail try other MX records on
 > 4XX status) ever made part of netqmail?

No.

--

-- 
--my blog is at    http://blog.russnelson.com   | People have strong opinions
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | about economics even though
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241       | they've never studied it.
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  |     Sheepdog          | Curious how that is!