4 Nov 2010 18:24
Re: Re: Re: Re: Intriguing title of publication - just found in my inbox as an alert...
Clemens Gresser <cgresser <at> gmail.com>
2010-11-04 17:24:41 GMT
2010-11-04 17:24:41 GMT
Yes, I think Fred Maus' comment is a fair one on Commentary. I couldn't actually bear to read anything else - even the Cage-related article was "hard work". Of course, as it's neither a music journal, nor intending to be a scholarly publication I will file it for my project to be completed in 20?? on "Cage reception after 1992" - or something. Best wishes, Clemens On 4 November 2010 15:16, Fred Maus <fem2x <at> virginia.edu> wrote: > Commenary is a politically-oriented journal, long a forum for > neo-conservative thought. I see no reason to expect that it would be > promoting John Cage's ideas! > > - Fred Maus > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:54 AM, <lrdrz <at> aol.com> wrote: >> Hi Clemens & Silencers! >> >> I guess that's not the first time that an article in the Wall Street Journal >> understands something >> terribly wrong. >> There are many people running around trying to tell us that Cage was a bad >> composer & his >> works are worth nothing. But to declare him guilty of "killing off >> modernism"?! Well, actually >> he can't be punished any more for his crime>> >> Anyway, it's makes a nice anecdote. And I'll counter Mr. Teachout's thesis >> with my own: >> So called "music journalists" propagate stupidity. >> >> Back to work, too: >> Lothar >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- >> Von: Clemens Gresser <cgresser <at> gmail.com> >> An: silence <at> list.mail.virginia.edu >> Verschickt: Do., 4. Nov. 2010, 15:23 >> Thema: [silence] Re: Intriguing title of publication - just found in my >> inbox as an alert... >> >> >> >> >> Okay, folks... that was unexpected! You have been part of my resource >> >> discovery programme! >> >> From this morning getting this publication alert, to the beginning of >> >> my lunch break proper (finding the abstract online) to now (having >> >> found that we have this magazine, Commentary, >> >> at my work place) - I have now read this article. >> >> >> >> What I had posted as an "abstract" turned out to be the first two >> >> paragraph of this article. >> >> The author mentions recent books on Cage (Gann's book on 4'33", >> >> Silverman's biography on Cage), but overall it seems to say - to me: >> >> >> >> ----beginning of my paraphrasing of Teachout's argument---- >> >> okay, we realise that Cage was significant in some mysterious ways, >> >> but all his post-4'33" works are bad, and not worth listening to or >> >> performing. That's also why he never gets performed by >> >> proper/established musicians or ensembles! However, he does seem to >> >> have killed of modernism, as people stopped composing in a modernistic >> >> way (think Boulez and Stockhausen) and basically went "minimal" (think >> >> Glass, Reich, etc.). >> >> ----end of my paraphrasing---- >> >> >> >> The author also rehashes the myth of Cage having no ear for harmony >> >> (queue Schoenberg, who "at least kind of knew how to compose properly" >> >> and using the famous "brick wall quotation"). >> >> >> >> Okay, I'm obviously biased - having spent the last 15ish years to >> >> understand (or at least live with the "contradictions" of) Cage's >> >> thinking, oeuvre, etc., but I truley think that works like, say, >> >> Apartment House 1776, are compositions which show his avoidance of >> >> "nice, traditional" harmonies (think smaller chamber groups within the >> >> ensembles) by writing, yes, beautiful, syntax-reduced harmonies = i.e. >> >> nice music.
>> >> >> >> Personally, I also enjoy the sounds and the concepts of the "number >> >> pieces", but I admit that due to the (mostly) computer-generated >> >> pitches/timings (see Pritchard for why AH 1776 is different!), most >> >> conservative folks wouldn't call these 'proper' "compositions". >> >> >> >> Anyway, don't go to great length of getting access to this piece by >> >> Teachout - unless you are _very_ new to "Cage's world" and have just >> >> started researching him (or indeed: if you are studying "reception of >> >> JC", after 1992....), or the magazine is in easy reach (as in my case, >> >> just a reading room away from my office). >> >> >> >> Back to work, >> >> Clemens >> >> >> >> On 4 November 2010 13:32, Clemens Gresser <cgresser <at> gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> P.S. >> >>> It's lame to reply to your own postings, but... I just found the >> >>> magazine's web page, and an abstract (see >> >>> >>> http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/plenty-of-nothing-15539?search=1); >> >>> I like the quotation by Stravinsky though.
>> >>> >> >>> Plenty of Nothing >> >>> Terry Teachout >> >>> October 2010 >> >>> >> >>> Abstract – >> >>> Who deserves to be considered America’s most significant classical >> >>> composer? Concertgoers of a certain age will doubtless choose Aaron >> >>> Copland or George Gershwin, the creators of the first distinctively >> >>> American-sounding styles of classical composition, while more >> >>> contemporary listeners are more likely to cite Philip Glass or John >> >>> Adams, who made minimalism the dominant classical-music idiom of the >> >>> postwar era. But if “significant” is taken to mean “influential,” then >> >>> a strong, if seemingly paradoxical, case can be made for a composer >> >>> who, for all the undeniable influence he has exerted on American >> >>> music, failed to write even one work that has made its way into the >> >>> repertoires of any well-known orchestra, opera company, chamber group, >> >>> singer, or instrumentalist. >> >>> >> >>> If John Cage is known to the average concert goer today, it is for a >> >>> piece of “music” that by conventional standards is nothing of the >> >>> kind. 4'33", “composed” in 1952, consists of three movements during >> >>> which the piece’s performer or performers (it can be performed by any >> >>> combination of instrumentalists and/or singers) come on stage and sit >> >>> in silence for a total of four minutes and 33 seconds. Not >> >>> surprisingly, it was widely assumed at the time that 4'33" was a joke, >> >>> a piece about nothing. Igor Stravinsky acidly remarked that he looked >> >>> forward to hearing “works of major length” by similarly inclined >> >>> composers. >> >>> >> >>> About the Author >> >>> Terry Teachout, our chief culture critic and the drama critic of the >> >>> Wall Street Journal, wrote about Moss Hart in the last issue. He is at >> >>> work on a biography of Duke Ellington. >> >>> >> >>> --- >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 4 November 2010 09:30, Clemens Gresser <cgresser <at> gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Dear All, >> >>>> >> >>>> Out from the dungeons of busyness... >> >>>> I just found an alert email in my inbox, for the following Cage-related >>>> text: >> >>>> >> >>>> COMMENTARY -NEW YORK- AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE- OCT. (2010) pp. 55-58 >> >>>> Plenty of Nothing: How the composer John Cage killed musical modernism >> >>>> Teachout, T. >> >>>> >> >>>> If I manage to trace this text and read it, I will send a follow-up to >>>> this. >> >>>> If anyone beats me to it, please let me/the list now whether it's >> >>>> a) pro/anti/"neutral" Cage >> >>>> and >> >>>> b) has an interesting argument >> >>>> >> >>>> Best wishes, >> >>>> Clemens >> >>>> -- >> >>>> ***** >> >>>> MusiCB3 Blog: http://musicb3.wordpress.com/ >> >>>> My home page: http://home.arcor.de/cgw/ >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> ***** >> >>> MusiCB3 Blog: http://musicb3.wordpress.com/ >> >>> Follow Cambridge University Library - Music Department on twitter: >> >>> http://twitter.com/MCatheul >> >>> Follow Pendlebury Library of Music on twitter: >>> http://twitter.com/PendleburyLib >> >>> Pendlebury Library of Music FB account: http://alturl.com/mafqi >> >>> My home page: http://home.arcor.de/cgw/ >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ***** >> >> MusiCB3 Blog: http://musicb3.wordpress.com/ >> >> Follow Cambridge University Library - Music Department on twitter: >> >> http://twitter.com/MCatheul >> >> Follow Pendlebury Library of Music on twitter: >> http://twitter.com/PendleburyLib >> >> Pendlebury Library of Music FB account: http://alturl.com/mafqi >> >> My home page: http://home.arcor.de/cgw/ >> >> >> >> = > -- -- ***** MusiCB3 Blog: http://musicb3.wordpress.com/ Follow Cambridge University Library - Music Department on twitter: http://twitter.com/MCatheul Follow Pendlebury Library of Music on twitter: http://twitter.com/PendleburyLib Pendlebury Library of Music FB account: http://alturl.com/mafqi My home page: http://home.arcor.de/cgw/
>>
>> Anyway, it's makes a nice anecdote. And I'll counter Mr. Teachout's thesis
>> with my own:
>> So called "music journalists" propagate stupidity.
>>
>> Back to work, too:
>> Lothar
>>
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
>> Von: Clemens Gresser <cgresser <at> gmail.com>
>> An: silence <at> list.mail.virginia.edu
>> Verschickt: Do., 4. Nov. 2010, 15:23
>> Thema: [silence] Re: Intriguing title of publication - just found in my
>> inbox as an alert...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Okay, folks... that was unexpected! You have been part of my resource
>>
>> discovery programme!
>>
>> From this morning getting this publication alert, to the beginning of
>>
>> my lunch break proper (finding the abstract online) to now (having
>>
>> found that we have this magazine, Commentary,
>>
>> at my work place) - I have now read this article.
>>
>>
>>
>> What I had posted as an "abstract" turned out to be the first two
>>
>> paragraph of this article.
>>
>> The author mentions recent books on Cage (Gann's book on 4'33",
>>
>> Silverman's biography on Cage), but overall it seems to say - to me:
>>
>>
>>
>> ----beginning of my paraphrasing of Teachout's argument----
>>
>> okay, we realise that Cage was significant in some mysterious ways,
>>
>> but all his post-4'33" works are bad, and not worth listening to or
>>
>> performing. That's also why he never gets performed by
>>
>> proper/established musicians or ensembles! However, he does seem to
>>
>> have killed of modernism, as people stopped composing in a modernistic
>>
>> way (think Boulez and Stockhausen) and basically went "minimal" (think
>>
>> Glass, Reich, etc.).
>>
>> ----end of my paraphrasing----
>>
>>
>>
>> The author also rehashes the myth of Cage having no ear for harmony
>>
>> (queue Schoenberg, who "at least kind of knew how to compose properly"
>>
>> and using the famous "brick wall quotation").
>>
>>
>>
>> Okay, I'm obviously biased - having spent the last 15ish years to
>>
>> understand (or at least live with the "contradictions" of) Cage's
>>
>> thinking, oeuvre, etc., but I truley think that works like, say,
>>
>> Apartment House 1776, are compositions which show his avoidance of
>>
>> "nice, traditional" harmonies (think smaller chamber groups within the
>>
>> ensembles) by writing, yes, beautiful, syntax-reduced harmonies = i.e.
>>
>> nice music.
>>
>>
>>
>> Personally, I also enjoy the sounds and the concepts of the "number
>>
>> pieces", but I admit that due to the (mostly) computer-generated
>>
>> pitches/timings (see Pritchard for why AH 1776 is different!), most
>>
>> conservative folks wouldn't call these 'proper' "compositions".
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyway, don't go to great length of getting access to this piece by
>>
>> Teachout - unless you are _very_ new to "Cage's world" and have just
>>
>> started researching him (or indeed: if you are studying "reception of
>>
>> JC", after 1992....), or the magazine is in easy reach (as in my case,
>>
>> just a reading room away from my office).
>>
>>
>>
>> Back to work,
>>
>> Clemens
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4 November 2010 13:32, Clemens Gresser <cgresser <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> P.S.
>>
>>> It's lame to reply to your own postings, but... I just found the
>>
>>> magazine's web page, and an abstract (see
>>
>>>
>>>
RSS Feed