14 Jun 2002 21:32
RE: argus command-line parameter handling
Chris Russel <russel <at> yorku.ca>
2002-06-14 19:32:57 GMT
2002-06-14 19:32:57 GMT
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Carter Bullard wrote: > I think the problem is that the Argus project is > going to provide maximum flexibility, rather than trying to > keep the user from shooting themselves. I completely agree with this philosophy and I don't think that's a problem. I think this problem falls into the hidden/undocumented behaviours category. Maybe my message will help with the documentation aspect. My vote is to not load the default config unless no -F is specified. This is the behaviour the debian init script is expecting. BTW I have filed a bug with them since it is clearly wrong - allowing users to shoot themselves is one thing, having the gun pointed at them by default is another. The simplest thing would be to not load a default config at all and just use hard-coded values unless overridden by -F's or equivalent command-line parameters. That would eliminate having to test for duplicate interfaces or duplicate config files (it's still possible but it would be the users doing). Obviously this breaks with some traditional usage. -- -- Chris Russel | CNS Information Security russel <at> yorku.ca | York University, Toronto, Canada
RSS Feed