Re: Hold timer expired: difference between Received/Error

on 30.06.2011 21:06 Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:25:20PM +0200, Arnold Nipper wrote:
>>> Yes, exactly that.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks ... and what does "<RMT>" stand for? When analysing the log I see
>>
>> flags. All but "RMT" at least have an intuitive meaning to me.
> 
> You are right:
> 
>> Otoh iirc <RMT> means that the message is received from the ReMoTe peer
> 

Aren't you contradicting yourself?

On one hand a log message like

 2011-04-30 00:05:42 <RMT> YYYY: Error: Hold timer expired

does indicate ("<RMT>" flag) that it is received from the remote peer.

On the other hand you say it means that the hold timer expired locally.
Presumably a notification would be generated and sent to the remote peer
before session tear-down.

That does at least not make sense to me.

Arnold
--

-- 
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: arnold <at> nipper.de       phone: +49 6224 9259 299
mobile: +49 152 53717690      fax:   +49 6224 9259 333