5 May 09:34
AW: AW: ejabberd vs Jabber XCP
From: Staudinger, Ulrich <ulrich.staudinger <at> lycos-europe.com>
Subject: AW: AW: ejabberd vs Jabber XCP
Newsgroups: gmane.network.jabber.ejabberd
Date: 2006-05-05 07:35:29 GMT
Subject: AW: AW: ejabberd vs Jabber XCP
Newsgroups: gmane.network.jabber.ejabberd
Date: 2006-05-05 07:35:29 GMT
20k is no problem with ejabberd. You can have up to 63k if you have the memory. You need to use the epoll patch for erlang ( google is your friend ). And you need to specify the ulimit in linux. 20k if i remember correctly require 1GB of Ram (approx. Or was it 2G?) Regards, Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: ejabberd-bounces <at> jabber.ru [mailto:ejabberd-bounces <at> jabber.ru] Im Auftrag von Joel Reymont Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Mai 2006 09:26 An: ejabberd <at> jabber.ru Cc: Ulrich Staudinger Betreff: Re: AW: [ejabberd] ejabberd vs Jabber XCP Ulrich, BTW, I'm looking at this post of yours: http://lists.jabber.ru/pipermail/ejabberd/2005-December/001495.html How do you manage 20k users on a single node? I thought a single process would have trouble with 20k sockets. Did you configure Erlang to use kqueue/epoll/etc. on Linux to go that high? Thanks, Joel -- http://wagerlabs.com/ _______________________________________________ ejabberd mailing list ejabberd <at> jabber.ru http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
RSS Feed